RESOURCES FOR DRC/URC and CRCs

Workshops on Holistic Review of Faculty for D/URC and CRCS Fall 2025 Schedule

BEST PRACTICES FOR HOLISTIC FACULTY REVIEW

Please check back for locations

  • Wednesday, September 3rd: 9:00 – 10:50 a.m. Cone 112
  • Wednesday, September 10th: 10:00 – 11:50 a.m. Cone 111
  • Tuesday, September 16th: 12:00 – 1:50 p.m. Student Union 262
  • Thursday, September 18th 1:30 – 3:20 p.m. Cone 111

POWERPOINT

POWERPOINT : Best Practices in Holistic Faculty Review Workshop, presented by: Tehia Glass, Interim Executive Director, The Center for ADVANCing Faculty Success; Sarah Edwards – Associate Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs and Deputy General Counsel and Holly Middleton – Associate Director of Engaged Scholarship. You need to be signed in with your charlotte.edu email to access

RESOURCES FOR D/URC and CRCs

Tenure Policies, Regulations, and Procedures of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte: University Policy: 102.13

Section 6: Procedures for Review for Reappointment, Promotion, and the Conferral of Permanent Tenure for Faculty Members in Professorial Ranks

UNC Charlotte UrbanCORE’s RPT Resources for Community-Engaged Scholarship

Evaluation Tool for Community Engaged Scholarship from the American Sociological Association

Statement from American Sociological Association on Student Evaluations of Teaching

MONASH UNIVERSITY: GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING ACHIEVEMENT RELATIVE TO OPPORTUNITY FOR DECISION MAKERS (Must be logged in using charlotte.edu credentials to access this)

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE PANDEMIC IMPACT STATEMENT THAT FACULTY CAN COMPLETE TO BE INCLUDED IN THEIR ANNUAL REVIEWS

List of Resources Discussing Student Evaluations and the RPT Process, Particularly as they Pertain to Women and URM Faculty

  • Boring et al. (2016) Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness ScienceOpen Research (DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1)
  • Hamermesh, D. S. & Parker, A. M. (2005). Beauty in the classroom:Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, vol. 24, issue 4, pages 369-376
  • Marsh, H.W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 8. New York: Agathon Press. –
  • Wachtel, H.K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191-211.
  • Weinberg, B. A., Fleisher, B. M., & Hashimoto, M. (2007). Evaluating methods for evaluating instruction: The case of higher education (NBER Working Paper No. 12844). Retrieved August 5, 2013, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12844